#WORLD WAR 3 CNN NEWS HOW TO#
#WORLD WAR 3 CNN NEWS SKIN#

So what happened? Was the early 2019 sample a different strain? You can see how messy this is to analyse.īioweapons are a longstanding threat. That means it was already circulating around the world back then, and no outbreaks at all occurred. The outbreak in Wuhan was in December 2019. There’s a problem, though – The virus was found in Spain in sewage samples from early 2019. Sporadic outbreaks leading to a bigger outbreak, for example, worldwide. The outbreak itself has quite a few issues as a direct attack. Allegations aren’t facts until proven, either.) There’s nothing stunningly unusual about a lab studying SARS viruses. Evidence of viruses in an epidemic zone doesn’t prove weaponization or anything else. Wuhan labs are supposedly sources of COVID, but that was also where the outbreak first happened. Is China really dumb enough to do this? Did it? How good is the proof? Statements of weapons options don’t prove that they were actually developed. Just about every nation can wage gray warfare in some form, and China’s aggressive diplomacy hasn’t helped improve their image. Gray warfare on this scale would turn the world into “China’s Vietnam”.

It’s simply suicidal for China to engage in this pointless exercise. There are a lot of biology and chemical options, too.

#WORLD WAR 3 CNN NEWS HOW TO#

There are plenty of people who know how to do it. China’s digital economy could be turned into confetti. China’s huge trade and infrastructure are also very vulnerable. If proven, China would also have dropped a bioweapon on every other state on Earth. That government could have no global credibility at all. The Chinese government would be held responsible. The damage to China’s relations with the rest of the world, (including those who don’t like the current 3,296,686 deaths and counting), would be permanent. If someone believes this allegation, China has committed an act of war against the world, and the world won’t like it. A risk is a risk, and responses to risks tend to be before the fact, rather than after it. If these presumed allegations of a deliberate release of a bioweapon are sufficiently credible, China is asking for all-out responses from around the world.

#WORLD WAR 3 CNN NEWS SKIN#

China has a lot of skin in this game, and a lot to lose. This is undeclared war, and it includes cyberattacks, etc. A “persistent agent”, meaning a disease which can exist for long times in the environment, would be worse.Ĭhina has also created an incalculable problem for itself – So-called “Gray warfare”. A super-hot pneumonic virus would be devastating, far beyond COVID. The large Chinese population is a gigantic, unmissable target. China would be incredibly vulnerable to introduced viruses. This overlooks another issue – Retaliation. Even a big rich country couldn’t handle multiple bio attacks easily, if at all. That rather basic description may be an understatement, if China is really inviting retaliation. China may be diplomatically obnoxious, but nobody’s ever called modern China “brain-dead stupid”. The point here is that this risk couldn’t possibly have escaped even the most mediocre military intelligence. Viruses in particular were singled out as unstable and uncontrollable. Another consideration was the likelihood of escalation of bioweapons into a mutual destruction scenario. The general agreement was that the weapons couldn’t be controlled, and the stocks were supposedly destroyed. During the Cold War, America and Russia had large stocks of bioweapons. Is this real logic? Doesn’t look like it.īioweapons, particularly viruses, are by definition very high risk, and that includes risks to those using them. This truly off-the-scale bit of idiocy could only rebound against China, and severely. One of the supposed stated reasons is “economic warfare”. Why would a country which is so newly prosperous and, politics aside, doing good business, have any interest in this sort of weapon? If this document is genuine, and it has been verified as such, it’s a hideous reflection on the state of China’s mindset. The paper points out these viruses could be “…artificially manipulated and unleashed in a way never seen before.” SARS viruses, of which COVID is one, were described as new genetic weapons. According to this document, the discussion was of a possible World War 3 scenario in which bioweapons are used freely. The news coming out of a leaked Chinese document dated 2015 isn’t at all impressive. If that’s the case, it’s a sign of unbelievable idiocy. Yet.ĭid China commit an act of war? There’s a lot of information coming out, not yet confirmed, which points to a discussion of developing bioweapons by the Chinese military. China may be diplmatically obnoxious, but nobody’s ever called modern China “brain-dead stupid”.

World war 3 cnn news